Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Can Sustainable Agriculture feed the Population !

With the introduction of green revolution technologies, the food grain production has gone up manifold. Modern, high yielding varieties supported by technologies such as fertilizers, pesticides, mechanization, irrigation, etc have contributed to the magnificent increase in the production. Many developing countries like India have become self sufficient in food production.

On the flip side, modern farming has affected ecology and led to degradation of natural resources particularly soil and water. Moreover, under fragile ecosystem, the crop production is becoming stagnant and showing the signs of decline. The additional technological introduction is not contributing to any further increase in the production and a point of diminishing marginal returns is looming large over production front in agriculture.

Due to degrading environment and natural resources, no modern technology can assure indefinite increase in production. But the population is growing at an alarming rate, which is the potential cause for food crisis in the future.

In this backdrop, sustainable agriculture is considered a new road ahead by development visionaries. The agricultural community has no dispute over the idealness of the sustainable practices. But the real issue is about production potential to meet the food demand. No doubt that sustainable practices cannot yield to the same measure as modern practices in the initial stages of farming, but over the years, it can ensure similar and stable yields.

What are the key aspects to make it successful !

Eating junk food : We are eating more because we eat junk food. Modern practices have been harping on production in terms of quantity but not quality. Various researches have conclusively proved beyond doubt that food produced under sustainable or organic farming are better in nutritional quality. It has direct bearing on consumption. For example, farmers themselves have experienced that some traditional varieties of rice and finger millet can cook well and the quantity of grain or floor required for a family is 30-35% less compared to modern varieties under chemical farming. This is due to rich mineral content in those grains. Traditional varieties, evolved over thousands of years, under a particular agro climatic condition, adapt well and produce superior quality grains than the externally introduced ones. The milk of local animal breeds has more fat and proteins than the exotics. Sustainable agricultural practices produce better quality produce than the modern practices. Traditional or indigenous varieties adapt and produce better quality produce. Therefore, identification and introduction of superior local genetic resources in breeding process is an important scientific approach in sustainable agriculture to meet food demand in the changed scenario.

Post harvest management : The losses in transit, storage and distribution are too significant to ignore. Food Corporation of India has recorded 25-30% loss of food grains in storages, quite often. Sustainable agriculture can achieve a yield of 75-80% under conventional agriculture within a reasonable period of 2-3 years. Streamlining of post-harvest operations and minimizing the losses is a very important strategy to meet the food demand under sustainable agriculture. Creating decentralized infrastructure and distribution can have great impact on post-harvest management and reducing the losses.

Eco-friendly practices : Innovative practices have proved successful in obtaining yields comparable in some cases and much higher in some others. SRI (system of rice intensification) in rice, for example, with 30-40% less water consumption using semi-aerated soil condition can give additional yield of 50%, on an average. Similarly, mulching and other in-situ moisture conservation practices can improve yield under sustainable practices particularly under rain fed farming.

Food and crop diversity : Mono cropping, as a natural consequence of modern agriculture, tends to erode diversity in food and cropping systems. Out of known 4500 crop species in the world, hardly 20 are adding to 90% of our food requirement. Again, few varieties in each crop account for more than 90% of the production. Diversified food, due to rich nutritional value, has great potential to reduce consumption. Reinventing multi-cropping and species diversity in farming systems is central to sustainable agriculture.

Land diversion : Considerable land is being diverted every year through policies of the state. In 1970’s, large area under food grains was diverted to silkworm rearing in south India by establishing silk industry and motivating the farmers. Similarly, cotton is being promoted on large scale to boost export economy. Urbanization and industrial development policies are diverting areas under food grains and horticulture. This has to stop somewhere to ensure food production for the growing population. Increasing pressure on land through reducing the cultivable area pushes us to chemical and intensive farming, which is not ecologically sustainable.

Sustainable marketing : Promoting decentralized, local marketing processes gives stability to agricultural production. Cropping system determined by an agro climatic situation has to dictate agricultural market. This stabilizes the demand-supply chain. This, in turn, scales down unorganized production by the farmers dictated by fluctuating distant market, which is also a source of post harvest losses. Sustainable marketing and sustainable farming always go together.

Agro eco system : Reviving agro ecology is the sure way of increasing productivity and sustaining it. It enriches the soil through biomass, conserves other natural resources (water, insect and microbial environments) and creates microclimate. It creates pivotal role in recycling of nutrients to sustain soil productivity thus contributing to production.

Development policies : Achieving food production through sustainable practices needs teeth to state policies. Balancing export and domestic economies, putting a lid to urbanization and diversion of land, post harvest management and distribution, interventions in institutional research, etc can make it happen. Phase wise transition to sustainable agriculture and a meticulous plan for the future can take it forward.

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Eco-friendly Soil Nutrient Management

When the first fertilizer was manufactured in the 19th century, scientific community was euphoric that it would be the panacea for all the ills plaguing agriculture in the world. Undoubtedly, synthetic nutrient sources have led to huge increase in production of crops particularly on low fertile soils with high yielding varieties and hybrids. Fertilizers result in rapid growth and development of plants when applied particularly under irrigated conditions.

The euphoria was short lived. Soon, we could notice the grave dangers of synthetic fertilizers on the health of the soil, quality of underground water, microbial ecology, tolerance of crops to pests and diseases, etc. Over the years, synthetic fertilizers make the soil biologically inert resulting in poor soil structure and dominance of soil borne pathogens. Fertilized soils degrade in water holding capacity due to depletion of beneficial soil microbes and biomass content. Fertilized crops are susceptible to pests and diseases due to lush growth, which necessitates heavy pesticide applications. Synthetic pesticides destroy the dynamic equation between insect pests/pathogens and beneficial insects/microbes. The cost of production increases in the inorganic farming practices due to degradation of ecology. The farming practice heavily dependent on external, synthetic sources and poisonous pesticides is not ecologically sustainable. The food thus produced is unhealthy due to accumulated toxic substances in the food chain. Synthetic fertilizers are the key factor in this vicious cycle of unsustainable farming.

Are there alternatives!
Alternative soil nutrient management could be the turning point in reversing these unhealthy farming systems. Adding organic carbon and biomass is the effective way out. Scientific community world over has accepted the un-sustainability of inorganic sources for soil and crop management. But, it has been pondering over the alternative sources, as the manures and biomass are bulky and low in nutrients. The quantity required to meet the nutrient demand is exorbitantly high compared to concentrated inorganic fertilizers.

The concentrated organic manures such as edible and non-edible oil cakes contain high nutrients but are uneconomical on the farmers’ field. Among the bulky manures, horse manure, pig manure, night soil, sludge and chicken manure are quite high in nutrients. Chicken manure is widely available and most economical also. It contains 3% nitrogen, 2.5% P2O5 and 1.5% K2O besides being rich in secondary and micronutrients.

The comparison between chicken manure and synthetic fertilizers throws some interesting facts. 1000kg chicken manure supplies 30kg N, 25kg P2O5 and 15kg K2O. To supply this through fertilizers, farmer has to apply 52kg DAP, 45kg Urea and 25kg MOP. Under the local conditions, the cost of chicken manure would be RS. 600-700 per 1000kg. The costs of fertilizers would be about Rs. 900-950 for the above quantity. To supply micronutrients corresponding to chicken manure, it would cost much higher with fertilizers as micronutrient fertilizers are to be added separately. In short, a farmer has to spend Rs. 10 per kg of N, P2O5 and K2O together through chicken manure while Rs. 13 through NPK fertilizers. It clearly demonstrates that, there are organic sources, which are cost effective, ecologically sustainable and practical.

Chicken manure is available in the country in large quantities as poultry is a huge meat industry. Other such widely available sources are sludge, pig manure and fishmeal. They are potential sources of nutrients to the soil as alternatives to chemical fertilizers.

Environmental pollution
The utilization of these sources also helps in combating environmental pollution as they are dumped as wastes or diverted as in case of sludge. Based on local conditions, such organic wastes can be recycled for soil nutrient management. In most developing countries, these wastes are the sources of ground water contamination and human diseases.

Policy directions
State policies in this direction can create conducive atmosphere to utilize such organic wastes in sustainable agriculture. Establishing small-scale industries to recycle the wastes and subsidies through departments to promote their applications can be of great impact on the ground situation in farming systems. It is well known that fertilizers are popular more due to government patronage through subsidies and fertilizer industries than due to farmers’ preference as such.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Essential Components of Sustainable Farming

Indigenous variety: It is evolved over a number of decades and centuries in an agro climatic region. It is easily adaptable, responsive to low input conditions, tolerant to drought, pests and diseases. Nutritionally better in quality.

Livestock: Source of manure and biomass for soil nutrition. Manures from livestock add beneficial microbes to the soil. Manure from poultry birds is an effective alternative to chemical fertilizers as it is a rich in major nutrients besides supplying secondary and micronutrients also. Livestock is income generating besides being the source of nutrition for the farming family.

Agro forestry: Creates microclimate. Important instrument in maintaining temperature, humidity, ecological balance like promoting natural enemies of pests, preventing soil and water erosion, etc. Useful source of fodder for livestock and fuel wood for the farming family. Adds biomass to the soil. Promotes the population of useful pollinators like honey bee. Attracts birds which are natural enemies of insect pests. Birds add guano, a source of nutrient to the soil.

Soil and water conservation: Practices such as bunding , trench cum bunding, farm ponds, contour sowing, bench terracing help conserve the fertile top soil and improve the water table thus making crop growing more successful under adverse conditions also.

Soil management and manures : Application of manures, vermicompost, oil cakes etc improve soil fertility, water holding capacity, texture and structure. Practices like green leaf manuring and green manuring in-situ keep the soil nitrogen rich. They create healthy soil by promoting beneficial microbes. Application of tank silt and forest soil improves texture, fertility and water holding capacity of the soils.

Water management: Mulching is the most effective tool in conserving moisture. It presents weed growth thus reducing the cost in farming. Water requirement of a crop reduces by 40% in mulching. It keeps the soil soft, aerated and promotes proliferation of beneficial microbes in the root zone. Indirectly, it improves crop growth. From the practical point of view, a farmer can increase his cropped area by 40% with the same available water by adopting mulching. Adoption of low water input technology like SRI in wet land paddy is another such practice for water management.

Multicropping and Intercropping: Increase the biodiversity, reduces pest and disease problems, ensures food and nutritional security, improves the soil health and fertility. It insures against crop failure risks. Acts as buffer against market fluctuations which hit the farmer in mono cropping practices. Intercropping (like in banana) increases the use efficiency of precious resources like water and gives additional income besides the main crop. Important component like fodder can be incorporated in intercropping.

Fodder crop: Closely linked to soil and water management as it is the source of feed for livestock. It should be a part of multicropping and intercropping in a sustainable farming practice.

Innovative crop practices: Plant intensification technique, raised bed in vegetables, border cropping, trap cropping, biodynamic practices, Homa therapy, EM, pheromone traps, NPVs, seed treatment, etc make the farming more successful and sustainable.

Friday, March 7, 2008

Can Production Driven Market Sustain Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods?

Market driven agricultural economy particularly after globalization, is showing the signs of severe fatigue on the rural faces in India. Market instabilities are a result of more centralized and long distance distribution of agricultural produce and products for marketing. Market preferences are leading to monoculture, introduction of high cost and chemical practices like inadaptable hybrid / high yielding varieties, indiscriminate use of fertilizers/chemicals and as a result, land/soil degradation. Erosion of agro-biodiversity is the most disheartening consequence of this market driven agricultural entrepreneurship.

Can Market be Production Driven!

A serious thought process has to begin to revive the biodiversity, multi-cropping based cropping systems in accordance with agro-climatic conditions of a given location or region. The approach towards development of technology has to be endogenous so that it becomes situation friendly. For example, breeding of high yielding varieties or hybrids has to make use of locally available, superior genetic resources of the same regions of introduction. Introduction of exotics can be done by taking into consideration the evolutionary agro climatic conditions of the genetic bases. Cropping pattern and varietal introduction should be primarily driven by suitability to climate, soil and farming practices. Considering the evolutionary conditions of genetic resources is the sure way ensuring adaptability. Similarly, market development needs to be promoted for the crops and products of the regions. Mainstream market initiatives should absorb the local production guided by suitable cropping system. Market driving the cropping pattern is not sustainable since creating suitable conditions for inadaptable crops and species is not practical / feasible. This is the root cause of high cost of production, frequent crop failures, unmanageable pest and disease incidences and ecological imbalances.

Market initiatives, guided by cropping pattern and production systems have positive impact on the ground. It promotes sustainable agriculture driven by agro climatic conditions. It sustains the livelihoods of farmers without affecting the ecological balance and agro biodiversity. Such initiatives are decentralized marketing relying more on local produce and products. These market tendencies are stable also. Block level shandies, agricultural produce fairs at taluk levels, corporate sectors decentralizing the supply chain by linking their outlets to local productions and promoting local food produce in urban and semi urban areas are the possible leads in this direction of sustainable marketing practices.

Policy Interventions

Promotion of medium, small and very small entrepreneurship in supply chain and marketing can give good results in this direction. Policy interventions from development of technology to marketing management are crucial to realize the objectives of sustainable livelihoods and revive the agricultural economy in rural areas.

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Market Driven Agriculture

Is Market Driven Production System Sustainable in Agriculture!

Post green revolution, agriculture is becoming more and more complicated and technology savvy enterprise. Technology has made vast invasions on production systems. Latest advances have made possible even simulation of required environment for growing the crops. Greenhouse technology, for example, makes year round cultivation of crops possible. Soilless culture such as hydroponics and rock wool give an illusion of agriculture without natural medium anywhere in the world. Thanks to corporate sector, diverse crops and varieties are finding places throughout the world like globalised, manufactured goods.

Globalised market tendencies have opened up flood gates for various food produces and products. Contract farming and buy back arrangements are the buzz words of cash rich farmers. Export boom is driving big business houses to build infrastructures for commercial enterprises in agriculture.

But a close analysis of the ground situation gives a shocking picture of agriculture and horticulture in India. Most of the export dependent floriculture units are facing closures either due to crash in export market or increasing cost of cultivation or quality problems as a result of pests and diseases. Farmers rushing to market driven crops like vanilla, ginger, perishable western vegetables, etc are in a soup as a result of unstable market tendencies.
Intensive, modern technologies have failed to give long term returns due to increasing cost of production and degradation of agro ecology. Medium and large farmers are facing debt trap as a result of irreversible stages they have reached in farming systems.

Besides, agro biodiversity is the biggest casualty of the modern market driven agriculture due to intensive monoculture package by the technologists. Degradation of agro ecology, soil and as a result, increasing intensity of pests and diseases is adding to very high cost of production. Lack of adaptable varieties and hybrids has made the situation worse for farmers and agricultural entrepreneurs.

Fluctuation in the market demand and prices has made the profession a vicious circle of exploitation and distress. This is adding to the woes of landless laborers also in the rural areas due to worsening situation of the farming community. As a result, farmers’ apathy towards farming, abandoning of profession and migration of rural population is the common scenario in the country. Today, rural India is a mirror image of unsustainable agriculture economy and lost hopes of the future.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Development Approaches in Agricultural Technologies

Sustainability and endogenous development oriented policies are the key to make agriculture a viable enterprise. Technology has to be adaptable to the local/prevailing agro climatic, soil, water and cultural conditions to make it sustainable. Development approach devoid of endogenous angle needs creation of ideal/artificial conditions which is not practical and sustainable in agriculture. Let me take the example of hybrid seed technology to illustrate the point. There are two approaches to this.

Exogenous approach : This is the approach being followed by the institutions and corporate sector, post-green revolution era. Best performing genetic materials are selected from different regions of the world or a country with varied agro climatic conditions in the breeding program. Two parental lines are selected to get a hybrid taking into consideration traits such as fruit/grain quality or yield, dwarfness, pest/disease tolerance, etc.

The evolutionary agro climatic, soil and other conditions of the parents are not considered in this process. Nor does it include farmers participation is developing the products. F1 hybrids thus developed are tested in different parts and introduced based on the performance in representative areas. Performance of such products are by chance or coincidence. Assured performance requires creation of ideal conditions of climate, soil, water and ecosystem which is not practical. Some conditions like soil nutrients and water can be created but only by involving huge costs and damaging the ecosystem which is neither economically feasible nor sustainable.

Endogenous approach : Let us consider the alternative approach. In this process, genetic materials are collected to develop the hybrids for a particular set of agro climatic conditions or a region. Hybridization is done using the parental lines of the conditions of the same region where hybrids would be introduced. They are introduced to the same conditions of evolution of their parents. The performance is not a chance here but assured. It is a product for the prevailing conditions in which the parental species are evolved.

This is the opposite process of endogenous approach where ideal conditions are sought to be created to perform to the potential. Sustainability and economic feasibility are the features here. It is a decentralized approach and closely linked to the market situation. It also stabilizes the agricultural production and the market because of stable distribution system. Community is also assured of sustained and stable income or livelihood from agriculture. Besides, it ensures the conservation of local biodiversity which is the casualty of the market driven agricultural production. Such approaches can involve participation of farmers and local governing bodies also.

Endogenous and sustainable approaches need to be adopted in other sectors also like promoting cropping pattern/production systems, supply chain management, distribution and marketing. The current cropping patterns are driven by market forces which are volatile and unreliable. In fact, market forces need to be driven by the production systems which are more sustainable and stable. They need to be decentralized involving local governing bodies so that market remains stable without bullish tendencies. Centralized marketing approaches are the major factors creating the unreliable situations forcing the farming community to adopt monoculture and intensive agriculture methods leading to glut conditions or shortage situations. This has impact on the farming community’s response on the ground making the agriculture an unsustainable enterprise.

Such alternative and sustainable development models demand development oriented professional management and policy directions. This requires thorough understanding of technical, management and sustainable development thinking.

The role of sustainable development professionals with technical background is crucial in guiding the policy makers, business houses, technocrats, academics and researchers besides farming community and local governments to really make the agriculture and food sector healthy and strong.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Indigenous Variety

WHAT IS INDIGENOUS VARIETY ?

What is indigenous seed variety for a farmer or from the agricultural point of view? Does it mean that the variety is from the same country? From the same region he belongs to? From the same village he is from?

Most people interpret and understand it as a variety from his own country. The perception that an indigenous variety is a variety from within the geographical, political, legal, administrative or emotional boundary is highly misplaced. Because, the most crucial issue of a variety is its adaptability to a given climate, soil and farming practices. Any crop variety adaptable to a given condition can be called indigenous variety. But, testing a variety for its adaptability and introducing to categorize it as indigenous will be misplaced again because it is evolved in similar conditions over a number of years.

When a farmer, scientist or policy maker looks for adaptability issue, he should trace the evolutionary conditions of a variety. Climatic (rainfall, temperature, humidity), soil and farming practice factors need to be traced. We should also have a fair idea about the prevailing conditions where a particular variety is intended to be introduced. The varieties of similar conditions (if not identical) can be exchanged and introduced between the regions or locations. Such a variety truly fits into the indigenous category for all practical purposes of farming.

Participatory approach
We need to adopt participatory approach in selecting a variety for cultivation. Collection of agro-climatic information through the farmers’ participation is more practical. Information on areas of a variety need to be collected by interacting with the local farmers. Seasonal information is also very crucial as to understand the adaptability of a variety. So also is the growing season of the interested crop species. Collection of similar information on the areas of the variety’s introduction should be done to decide on the release for cultivation. When the conditions of both the regions match or at least nearer, the variety can be considered suitable for cultivation. Season of growing can be decided from the collected information.

Sunday, February 3, 2008

Sustainable and Endogenous Approach

Agriculture Scenario in India

During my professional experience in agricultural field, I have been trying to understand and analyze the factors affecting the upliftment of rural community and urban agricultural enterprises in India. In spite of much-publicized Green Revolution in 1960’s and Horticultural Revolution in1980’s, the farming community’s socio-economic status either remained stagnant or has been deteriorating. Imagine the suicide death of thousands of farmers every year in a country where agriculture is the backbone of the economy and with more than two thirds of the population engaged in agriculture. More distressing is the very low productivity level in almost all the crops compared to other countries of the world.

The successive governments in independent India have never considered rural economy seriously. Planning has been poor in this sector. As a result, large sections of the farming community find agriculture a non-profitable enterprise and are migrating to urban areas in search of employment. There are alarming instances of distress selling of land by the farmers in the recent years.

The reasons are many

· There is a mismatch between the production, supply and requirement in market for agricultural commodities
· Unorganized production without any public policy based on food requirement of the country where as storage is pathetically organized witnessing over 30-40% of losses quite oftenly.
· Poor organization of the supply chain and distribution
· Lack of processing industry back up
· Poor post-harvest handling and storage
· Many a times, it is untimely production resulting in glut in the commodity market causing destruction of a large quantity of perishable produce or shortage situations.

This unorganized production where farmer is loosing, with tremendous depletion of natural resources is a result of unstable market tendencies. This is responsible for large-scale futile utilization of industrial inputs, which in turn makes use of non-renewable energy and raw materials.

India, being a diverse agro-climatic region, needs to evolve a comprehensive plan of cropping systems, supply chain and market management. Cropping pattern and production have to be planned as per the prevailing agro-climatic conditions.

Development Approaches
Sustainability and endogenous development oriented policies are the key to make it a viable enterprise. Technology has to be adaptable to the local/prevailing agro climatic, soil, water and cultural conditions to make it sustainable. Development approach devoid of endogenous angle needs creation of ideal/artificial conditions which is not practical and sustainable in agriculture particularly under such diverse conditions as Indian. Failure of the hybrid seed technology is the living example for the lack of endogenous approach.
Endogenous and sustainable approaches need to be adopted in other sectors also like promoting cropping pattern/production systems, supply chain management, distribution and marketing. The current cropping patterns are driven by market forces which are volatile and unreliable. In fact, market forces need to be driven by the production systems which are more sustainable and stable. They need to be decentralized involving local governing bodies so that market remains stable without bullish tendencies. Centralized marketing approaches are the major factors creating the unreliable situations forcing the farming community to adopt monoculture and intensive agriculture methods leading to glut conditions or shortage situations. This has impact on the farming community’s response on the ground making the agriculture an unsustainable enterprise.